As we were discussing whether 'wilderness' is a man-made construct, I started thinking about a recent pilosophy discussion about the concept of 'forest'. In that discussion, I realized that one can never know if they are looking at a forest. We can only see the trees, and then assume they are a part of a larger picture- the forest. I think the idea of wilderness is equally complicated.
In our discussion today in Cameron Park, we connected wilderness with both nature and the unknown. The concept implies a naturalness untainted by man-made structures and ideas. Isaac finds that he must leave behind his compass, map, gun, and watch (links to man-made cilivization) to truly enter the wilderness and see Old Ben. Wilderness, both to us and to Isaac, is the unknown, natural world devoid of human obscurities.
By this definition, it becomes clear that wilderness is a man-made construct. Man made building, pollution, and technology. We refer to the areas that man has not yet reached or changed to as 'wilderness'. So, without man-made constructs, everything would still exist in it's natural state, and there would be no need to define anything as wilderness. After all, what we term as 'wild' is simply the world in its natural, untainted state.

